Created by: gbmarc1
@taxpon @frol @mbohlool @cbornet @kenjones-cisco @tomplus @Jyhess @arun-nalla @spacether
When an attribute is named self in model __init__ fails because self is in kwargs. Generation maps self to _self properly. However, when calling the endpoint the deserialization fails.
openapi: 3.0.2
info:
title: bug report
description: Bug report
version: 0.60.1
servers:
- url: /inference/v1
paths:
/datasets:
get:
responses:
'200':
description: description
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/datasets'
components:
schemas:
datasets:
type: object
properties:
self:
type: string
import open_api
from open_api.api import datasets_api
# Defining the host is optional and defaults to http://localhost/inference/v1
# See configuration.py for a list of all supported configuration parameters.
configuration = open_api.Configuration(
host="/inference/v1",
)
# Enter a context with an instance of the API client
with open_api.ApiClient(configuration) as api_client:
# Create an instance of the API class
api_instance = datasets_api.DatasetsApi(api_client)
api_instance.v1_inference_datasets_get() # FAILS HERE
PR checklist
-
Read the contribution guidelines. -
Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community. -
Run the following to build the project and update samples: Commit all changed files. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master. These must match the expectations made by your contribution. You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example./mvnw clean package ./bin/generate-samples.sh ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*. For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH. -
File the PR against the correct branch: master,5.1.x,6.0.x -
If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.