Skip to content
GitLab

Split operation with multiple return types

Closed Oleh Kurpiak requested to merge github/fork/borsch/split-operation-witl-multiple-retur-types into master

This is a fix for issues like

There might be even more like those. The general idea of this PR is to split operation with different return types(content types) into multiple. While request for this feature was only for Spring, I did a global change since it was simpler to do in core, rather then in specific generator.

New flag is introduced to control this behavior and it's disabled by default

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples: 
    ./mvnw clean package 
./bin/generate-samples.sh
./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    Commit all changed files. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master. These must match the expectations made by your contribution. You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*. For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

Core team since this affects default generator: @wing328 @jimschubert @cbornet @jmini @etherealjoy @spacether

And java related committee since tests currently written for java/spring only: @bbdouglas (2017/07) @sreeshas (2017/08) @jfiala (2017/08) @lukoyanov (2017/09) @cbornet (2017/09) @jeff9finger (2018/01) @karismann (2019/03) @Zomzog (2019/04) @lwlee2608 (2019/10) @cachescrubber (2022/02) @welshm (2022/02) @MelleD (2022/02) @atextor (2022/02) @manedev79 (2022/02) @javisst (2022/02) @borsch (2022/02) @banlevente (2022/02)